Home NEWS The Elephant in the Room is $40 Million Dollars!

The Elephant in the Room is $40 Million Dollars!

Elephant in the Room

Let’s be honest…There are far more questions than answers right now on the new PGA bonus program the Tour is calling its Player Impact Program, which will be known going forward as the PIP. That’s right, we made it an acronym. That’s how we do!
 

What is the PIP:

Well, first It’s worth noting that the tour did not publicly announce the program. That’s right, a silent roll out of a HUGE bonus program paying out a whopping $40 million to select 10 players deemed to do the most to boost publicity and engagement for the game and the PGA Tour. The news rather was broken by Golfweek and then confirmed by tour officials. That got us thinking…Why? Why the hush hush, this is a big deal! Maybe because the idea was to reward the one percenters? Maybe because they weren’t sure how it would be received. Either way, it feels a little hush hush and begs the question…what’s the deal with this and why is it important to the tour?
 
All that being said, we have a few questions:
 

1. Where is the tour getting this lump sum of stashed loot?

Its not like it’s a few grand laying around, its $40 million! As it stands, there’s no corporate sponsor and there’s not likely to be one, if only because Fred Smith, the CEO of FedEx, which has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in the tour dating to 2007, would probably lose his mind if PGA Tour Commissioner Jay Monahan stood up and proudly proclaimed a new multi-million-dollar corporate partnership (Think Elon Musk) in order to pay 10 players millions of dollars.
 

2. As it is, I am curious how in the heck FedEx, whose contract with the tour runs for the next 6 years, will react to a new program that rewards players for being – wait for it…popular?

 Flawed as the FedEx Cup playoff system is, the hundreds of millions the company has invested has incentivized the top players to keep playing through the end of the summer. In years past, many would simply take a break or “mail it in” after the last major championship is over. To be fair, that was precisely the point when then-commissioner Tim Finchem negotiated FedEx to sign on in the first place. FedEx and the PGA Tour are in bed so deep that the FedEx logo is imbedded in the floor of the lobby inside the tour’s new multi-million-dollar headquarters.
 

3. Here’s the catch: the tour laid off about 50 employees last summer in the midst of the pandemic.

Now, however, they apparently have $40 million laying around to spend on 10 of its wealthiest players. Essentially saying: “We will just go ahead and chip off what we need of the gold bar and close up the old safe when we’re done”. Now, we are not getting political here, but It’s also worth noting that the tour would not move the Tour Championship out of Atlanta in the wake of the Georgia legislature passing a controversial voting-rights bill because leaving the area would harm local charities. Sooooo, why couldn’t the tour take a chunk of that $40 million, give it to the charities it benefits in the Atlanta region and move the tournament someplace else? Not saying that’s what should have been done, but it is worth an argument that Major League Baseball did exactly that when it announced it was moving the All-Star game out of Atlanta soon after the bill was passed?
 

4. Therein lies the next question: Why spend $40 million this way anyway?

Aren’t there a myriad of other, more worthwhile things, the money could can be used for other than handing out millions to a small group of men who are already multi-millionaires? The tour constantly cites its charitable giving—which to be completely fair is very generous and quite substantial. This is not an indictment on the tour but rather an open letter asking the question couldn’t all or some of that $40 million be better spent? Maybe give more to charity, Maybe support local junior golf initiatives, Maybe supporting families affected by Covid-19, shoot I can think of a dozen or so other ways to spend such a nest egg. There’s no such thing as enough when it comes to charities, especially nowadays in the wake of the pandemic.
 
MORE: Tour pros reaction to PGA Tour bonus pool: ‘There’s a little bit of envy’
 
Here’s an idea: The tour could use some of the money to increase purses at some of its lower-profile tournaments, where the bigger names don’t show up, alluring some bigger names and thus increasing interest amongst the golf community, better TV ratings and overall better golf. Right now, there are four major championships, three playoff events, four WGCs and the Players Championship that stars are expected to play. That’s 12 tournaments in 52 weeks. Really? That essentially means a top player only needs to play three more times to meet his minimum of 15 events per year. While I love incentives, The PIP does nothing to encourage the tour’s stars to play in more tournaments, or tournaments that could use their needle-moving power.
 
It seems obvious the PIP is simply a reaction to the threat of the proposed Premier Golf League, which was first publicly discussed a year ago. The PGL model calls for 18 events in a season for huge money (reportedly $240 million) each year. But despite all of the financial enticements, a handful of top-ranked players, including Rory McIlroy and Brooks Koepka, have already went on record saying they weren’t interested, stymieing the tour’s launch.

 
The very idea of the PGL clearly scared the tour, and in my humble opinion, the PIP appears to be a direct response to that concept: If we give top players millions for doing nothing on top of the millions they are already making, they won’t be tempted by the “currently conceptual” PGL. It’s an overreaction to something that doesn’t even exist at the moment.
 
That said, it’s worth noting who might be among the 10 players in line this year to receive the $40 million in bonuses the tour is going to hand out.
 
Presumably Tiger Woods is No. 1 on the list (because the tour hasn’t made any ranking public) even though he is recovering from his horrific car accident. Woods is often the most mentioned on social-media platforms that the tour proposes to use to measure, and I am finger quoting here, “impact”. If that’s the case, he still arguably receives more attention than anyone who is actually playing golf right now.
 

Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images
 
Here is what Tiger has done to the game…Years ago, when Woods was the No. 1 player in the world by leaps and bounds, Tommy Roy, NBC’s longtime golf executive producer, told me that a survey the network had done asked viewers this question: “Would you rather watch any other player hitting a shot or watch Tiger Woods leaning on his bag waiting for his turn to play?” According to Roy, 45 percent of viewers said they’d rather watch Woods talk club selection with then-caddie Steve Williams.
 
Woods is 45 now and no one knows if he will ever play in a PGA Tour event again, I for one believe we will see him peg it in 2022. Even with that there are still legions of fans who would rather read one of his tweets than watch Stewart Cink win at Hilton Head—all due respect Cink, whose comeback story is truly inspiring.
 
Now, guess who probably should be No. 2 on the list, if popularity is the measure? How about Charlie Woods. OK, he’s not eligible (yet) but think about the interest his presence at the PNC Challenge last December created among the media, TV, print, digital, social and otherwise. Of course, I’m kidding that Charlie should be paid for the engagement he helped bring the tour, but I bring him up to make the point that paying competitive athletes (or their children) based on popularity is ludicrous.
 
MORE: These are funny social-media posts from pros already gunning for the tour’s bonus pool cash
 
You know who else is clearly in the top 10, perhaps the top five? Rickie Fowler. Yes, I said it. Captain Orange. He is currently ranked 109th in the world and 128th on the FedEx points list. Remember, this isn’t about playing well, it’s about being popular. Fowler hasn’t been seen in a late group on Sunday in a long time, but he’s still on TV selling product non-stop and has a strong social-media presence. Plus, he’s a genuinely nice guy. Everyone loves Rickie, regardless of his struggles inside the ropes.
 
Bryson DeChambeau, aka Popeye, the sailor man, as well as Brooks Koepka, aka Brooksie would both certainly make the list for their feud and the attention it drew on social media. Bryson also won the U.S. Open last September, he now looks like a young Arnold Schwarznegger and could probably compete with Kyle Berkshire for length.
 
DJ, Rory, Spieth, Lefty (yes, at almost 51 Phil Mickelson) JT are likely to crack the list. Adam Scott? Perhaps given his appeal among men and women and his playoff finish at the Wyndham. Patrick Reed? Well, lets not get ahead of ourselves…Probably not so much unless it is during a Ryder Cup week and American fans are chanting, “USA,” every time he holes a putt. Then we love you Patrick any other week, not so much.
 
What about Masters champion Hideki Matsuyama? If this was Japan, he would be No. 1 by a massive margin. But it’s not. Collin Morikawa, the PGA champion and probably the best young player in golf? Maybe, maybe not. He’s just a superb player, an extremely bright guy and personable as they come. But he’s not big on social media. Get cracking Colin!
 
The larger point isn’t so much who will or will not be on the list. It’s the question again of why spend $40 million to make a bunch of very rich guys richer? To get them to sign more autographs or go on social media more often? Seriously? It’s flailing at an opponent who doesn’t even exist at the moment. It is just about the worst idea since New Coke. With luck, it will go away just about as quickly. Bye Felicia!

Previous articleRachel Uchitel Reveals New Details on the Last Time She Spoke to Tiger Woods
Next articleHow Should You Play a Tight [Links Style] Course?

8 COMMENTS

  1. I found your suggestion of moving the Tour Championship out of Atlanta and Georgia to be totally out of place. Unlike the NBA and the NFL, golf has remained out of politics. In addition, the argument has no merit as the law not restricting voting, it is simply making sure it is fair and accurate. Today you need a “COVID ID” to eat in a NYC restaurant, but 9 months ago you did not need an ID to vote in Georgia. How absurd!

  2. Guess we can’t move the tournament to Net York since their voting regulations are more restrictive than the new Georgia regulations

  3. PIP is a bad idea and places value on popularity rather than on performance on the golf course. Performance should be rewarded, not popularity. Give the 40 million to performing golfers, not popular golfers.

  4. Thomas J Thompson

    I watch and wonder why people don’t understand there is so much division in America when the powers that be continue to throw more money at people who have more than their share of the American dream. Just two years ago as a 71 year old on fixed income, I had a place that I could play regularly on a budget and occasionally with the assistance of the Golf Now and Tee Off app I could splurge and play a nicer course. Post covid closings that is no longer the case. Courses have become more crowded and more expensive with fewer deals out there for us old guys who must have a cart to navigate the monsters you guys are building these days. Half a cart now pushes $20 at most better public courses and pair that with an average non prime time green fee of over $40 and you have turned an enjoyable afternoon into an expensive 4 hours of frustration. I loved playing golf for the peaceful communion with my inner thoughts in a tranquil setting. Now its more like a trip to the doctors office, complete with long waits in the waiting room, screaming kids and a bill that discourages you from coming back unless absolutely necessary. There are days I thank God I don’t have that much time left in this life to watch the rich screw up everything that use to be enjoyed by the many rather than the few.

  5. I hope I’m right when I ask what would Arnold Palmer say?
    I hope and pray it would be to remember and support those who love or want to love the game. Not those whose sense of profit destroy such a beautiful sport!

  6. Golf is for the young and the wealthy. Make sure you have your stereo turned on to blast the fairways with your favorite gangsta rap. No joy

  7. $40 million for being popular is nearly as ridiculous as thinking that the Drive, Pitch and Putt nonsense is meant to grow the game…seriously?
    Fact is, one has to be very well off to be able to afford the costs to put their child through the D,C &P process.
    Why not take that $40 Million and make less fortunate youngsters have the same opportunity to play the game as the well oiled? Oh no, am I thinking like a liberal loon? Not exactly!
    The point I’m making is that people at the PGA are so damn brain-dead they should apply for work in the Biden Administration. Then they can just pretend that they care about the middle class.

  8. I have to take exception to Thomas Thompson’s comments. I hate self-pity and whining. I’m coming up on 87. Except for six years of active duty in the Marine Corps, I have been playing golf for 73 years. Every Tuesday I play a public course in Costa Mesa California with two friends who are older than I am. Our goal is always the same, that is, to finish on this side of the grass. We are not there for a peaceful communion with our inner thoughts- whatever that means. We’re there because we love the game and nothing is going to change that. If play is slow, it gives us a chance to commiserate with the old fogies in the foursome behind us. A beer afterwards doesn’t hurt either. I encourage Tommy to work on his attitude.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here